Recent blog posts
Debate on Baptism
There is a debate going on right now about whether a church that holds to believer's baptism should allow someone who has not been baptized to be a member, or even to break bread together with the rest of the church.
I find myself very much in agreement with Sam Storm, who writes:
Let me be clear on one thing. I am a credo-baptist, not a paedo-baptist. That is to say, I believe that only those who believe in Jesus Christ should receive the ordinance of water baptism. I also believe that the proper mode of baptism is by immersion. Ligon Duncan, on the other hand, is a Presbyterian paedo-baptist. Because of this, both Mark Dever and Al Mohler made it clear that if Duncan were in attendance at either of their churches they would not permit him to partake of the elements of the Lord's Supper.
Let me repeat that. Because of Duncan's paedo-baptist convictions, both Dever and Mohler would prohibit his participation in the Eucharist. They would deny to him partnership in the table of our Lord. They would withhold the bread and the cup from him because of his disagreement with them on who are the proper recipients of Christian baptism.
Storms goes on to point out how ridiculous this situation is considering that these men have joined together under the banner "Together for the Gospel", and Dever has even said that he wants to invite paedo-baptists to preach in his pulpit. Their Christian testimony would be good enough for them to preach to the church, but not good enough for them to be allowed to eat the Lord's supper with the church.